The relations seem reasonable to me, but apparently AutoCAD thinks otherwise.Īnd, of course, I want to set this up so that I can iterate quickly, meaning that changing one user parameter variable instantly returns the expected result. In order to circumvent what I show in the images, I try adding some more constraints, in an attempt to geometrically bind things and keep everything in place. Everything seems to fall apart after adding a few constraints. I use some additional dimensional constraints to achieve that. I want to give the array an "offset" of a value easily derived from the aforementioned parameters. until I want to move the Array base object from 0,0,0 (to be precise, until I move it along the Length axis). It is very easy to create this type of Dynamic point. That's the big difference between Arrays and Array Actions. Specifically, I have a user parameter controlling the number of arrayed instances and then I can define the distance as: This variable can then be fed to the Array included in the block, in the form of expressions. SO, I have this Length, which is controlled by the constraint parameter. Only User Parameters and Dimensional Constraints (constraint parameters) can use Expressions. Related Subreddits /r/Revit /r/Architecture /r/Autodesk /r/cad /r/civil3dīecause I want the Array to be Dynamic! (parametric, so to speak). PC Builds (See Wiki for Additional Info) ~$500USD PC Build ~$900USD PC Build ~$1500USD PC Build
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |